Reliability in research methods

What is Reliability?

Note, it can also be called inter-observer reliability when referring to observational research. One major problem with this approach is that you have to be able to generate lots of items that reflect the same construct.

Other areas of theatre such as lighting, sound, functions of stage managers should all be included. Ensuring behavior categories have been operationalized.

Reliability (statistics)

Parallel-Forms Reliability Used to assess the consistency of the results of two tests constructed in the same way from the same content domain. This means that they have been objectively defined.

Four practical strategies have been developed that provide workable methods of estimating test reliability. Thus researchers could simply count how many times children push each other over a certain duration of time.

This analysis consists of computation of item difficulties and item discrimination indices, the latter index involving computation of correlations between the items and sum of the item scores of the entire test.

The IRT information function is the inverse of the conditional observed score standard error at any given test score. The disadvantages of the test-retest method are that it takes a long time for results to be obtained.

Types of Reliability

It measures the stability of a test over time. Types of Validity 1. If the two halves of the test provide similar results this would suggest that the test has internal reliability. It is not a valid measure of your weight.

For a test to be reliable, it also needs to be valid. However, the responses from the first half may be systematically different from responses in the second half due to an increase in item difficulty and fatigue. When designing an assessment of learning in the theatre department, it would not be sufficient to only cover issues related to acting.

Average Inter-item Correlation The average inter-item correlation uses all of the items on our instrument that are designed to measure the same construct. Imagine that on 86 of the observations the raters checked the same category.

If the same or similar results are obtained then external reliability is established. The split-half method is a quick and easy way to establish reliability. Not everything can be covered, so items need to be sampled from all of the domains.

The parallel forms estimator is typically only used in situations where you intend to use the two forms as alternate measures of the same thing.

If a measure of art appreciation is created all of the items should be related to the different components and types of art.Reliability has to do with the quality of measurement.

In its everyday sense, reliability is the "consistency" or "repeatability" of your measures. Before we can define reliability precisely we have to lay the groundwork. Issues of research reliability and validity need to be addressed in methodology chapter in a concise manner.


Reliability refers to the extent to which the same answers can be obtained using the same instruments more than one time. In simple terms, if your research is associated with high levels of.

Each of the reliability estimators will give a different value for reliability. In general, the test-retest and inter-rater reliability estimates will be lower in value than the parallel forms and internal consistency ones because they involve measuring at.

Inter-method reliability assesses the degree to which test scores are consistent when there is a variation in the methods or instruments used. This allows inter-rater reliability to be ruled out. This allows inter-rater reliability to be ruled out.

Reliability is a measure of the consistency of a metric or a method. Every metric or method we use, including things like methods for uncovering usability problems in an interface and expert judgment, must be assessed for reliability.

In fact, before you can establish validity, you need to establish. Internal validity dictates how an experimental design is structured and encompasses all of the steps of the scientific research method. Even if your results are great, sloppy and inconsistent design will compromise your integrity in the eyes of the scientific community.

Internal validity and reliability are at the core of any experimental design.

Reliability in research methods
Rated 0/5 based on 11 review